Search results

Page title matches

Content and Format of a Group Removal RFD
...m experience what are the best methods for dealing with requests to remove a group or groups. We apologize for any frustration that such changes may ca ...oups to be removed as well as to see what cogent reasons there are for the removal.

8 KB (1,340 words) - 13:18, 2 May 2022

Rmgroup RFD
#REDIRECT [[Content and Format of a Group Removal RFD]]

55 bytes (9 words) - 00:13, 7 July 2010
Removal RFD
#REDIRECT [[Content and Format of a Group Removal RFD]]

55 bytes (9 words) - 05:18, 8 July 2010
Group Removal RFD
#REDIRECT [[Content and Format of a Group Removal RFD]]

55 bytes (9 words) - 05:20, 8 July 2010
The Great Downsizing 2012/1
*[[Final RFD / Last Call for Comments]] *[[Content and Format of a Request for Discussion (RFD)]]

453 bytes (63 words) - 13:45, 21 June 2012
The Great Downsizing 2011/2
|1st RFD |[[Nan:2011-07-19-rfd-great-downsizing-2]]

528 bytes (70 words) - 20:18, 31 August 2011
Group Removal FAQ
...around Usenet is that it makes it harder to create new ones. If creating a group is an irrevocable decision, more care has to be put into deciding to * Dead newsgroups may discourage newcomers from seeing the value of Usenet.

6 KB (957 words) - 15:33, 15 July 2010
Mass removal of groups
As of January 2011, there are about 1000 groups that received less than one post ...use the [[Procedure to remove newsgroups|conventional procedure]] for such a high number.

8 KB (1,217 words) - 20:46, 31 August 2011
The Great Downsizing 2011/1
|1st RFD |[[Nan:2011-02-01-rfd-great-downsizing]]

11 KB (1,831 words) - 14:07, 16 May 2011